Digital Humanities Abstracts

“Electronic Resources for Historical Linguists. Part 1: Medieval Studies”
Christian Kay University of Glasgow Jeremy Smith University of Glasgow, UK Simon Horobin University of Glasgow, UK Margaret Laing University of Edinburgh, UK Keith Williamson University of Edinburgh, UK

Chair: Christian Kay This session and session 8.1 on Monday 24 July will introduce a range of resources of particular interest to historical linguists and to those concerned with the development of text corpora and databases. Each of today's papers will be followed by discussion, but major issues may also be raised at the group discussion on Monday.

The Middle English Grammar Project

Jeremy Smith Simon Horobin
The study of linguistic variation in Middle English has undergone a revolution in recent years, with the publication of the "Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English" (McIntosh, Samuels and Benskin 1986) and other important surveys. However, no thorough-going attempt has as yet been made to harness this new information to a wider programme of linguistic description which is oriented from both structural and variationist perspectives. The Middle English Grammar Project, a British-Academy funded venture now underway at the University of Glasgow and at Stavanger College, Norway, is designed to address this gap, with the production of surveys covering the whole field of ME linguistic studies: spelling, phonology, grammar and lexicology. The Project is currently focused in the UK within the Institute for the Historical Study of Language, a research-centre within Glasgow's Faculty of Arts. The first research area being addressed by the Project is the creation of a new history of ME spelling and phonology. In order to carry out this analysis a corpus of machine-readable texts is currently being assembled. These texts are subsequently classified according to both Present-Day and etymological reflexes and the results of this process are entered in a database. This database includes a variety of extralinguistic information in addition to the classified spelling data, such as genre and script, which allows the corpus to be interrogated according to a number of different factors. This presentation will demonstrate this database and discuss its uses for the study of linguistic variation in Middle English, and historical linguistics more generally.

Two Historical Linguistic Atlases

Margaret Laing Keith Williamson
The principal aim of the "Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English" (LAEME ) and the "Linguistic Atlas of Older Scots" (LAOS) is to produce historical linguistic atlases complementary to "A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English" (LALME)°. Computer-based data-processing and analysis have been employed in the projects from their inception in 1987 . Their methodology differs radically from that used in LALME. Instead of recording data by a questionnaire of prescribed items, entire texts are diplomatically transcribed and keyed onto disk, where they can be analysed linguistically using programs written in-house. Each word or morpheme in a text is tagged according to its lexical meaning and grammatical function, and each newly tagged text is added to the corpus. The tagging creates a taxonomy of the linguistic material in the texts and permits systematic comparison of their dialects. Information on particular items (defined by one or more tags) may be abstracted from the corpus to identify spatial and/or temporal distributions of the forms associated with the item. The programs generate dictionaries, concordances, chronological charts and input files to mapping software. Maps are produced to show distribution of features or full text forms. This method of analysis has considerable advantages over the questionnaire. Items for study can be selected from a complete inventory of linguistic forms rather than from some predetermined sample. Tagged texts are immediately and constantly available to be processed and compared in whatever ways are desired. While not all the material in the corpus will be useful for dialectal analysis, it remains available for a wide range of future studies: historical phonology, morphology, syntax or semantics. We will demonstrate our method of lexico-grammatical tagging and illustrate how it may be exploited not only for linguistic geography, but also for phonological and for syntactic investigations.