What is the purpose of <label> in this context? It's required, but I don't see why I'd want to use it.KimTryka?
The label is what will appear in display as the "referencing string", as in "[Piez 2005]" (brackets or parens provided by the stylesheet) if referencing a paper by me, and along with that paper's listing in the bibliography. IME it is good to have this string kept distinct from the @id, which is often dragged into service for this. WendellPiez
I wonder whether encoding this as a label= attribute on <bibl> would be a reasonable thing to do? I realize this is a trivial change--so why would it matter? but it feels less odd than putting this into content. This suggestion is premised on the notion that the problem is one of author understanding, rather than actual function. JuliaFlanders
The primary reason this is modeled as an element (with a constrained position) is out of an analogy to the way
Do we need a tag for pages (for giving the total pagination or for citing a piece in a larger work)? Or is it assumed that this type of information will float in mixed content? Maybe this needs to be something like an <extent> tag - could hold the number of dvds, amount of time of a performance, etc.KimTryka?
I still like the mixed content model for its flexibility, but would like a structured display when the data is sufficiently structured to support it. (It's trying to structure it when it ain't, is what is hard.) WendellPiez
should there be a place for ISBN and price for published monographs?KimTryka?
Hm, what would this be under TEI? We could add them. Let's use an <idno> as in the header (which can serve for any ISBN, DOI or other), plus <price>. Is okay? WendellPiez
Can we provide a rationale for the <price> element? Is price ever included in standard citations? JuliaFlanders
A quick look around (New York Review of Books, NYT Book Review, Science, New Scientist, First Monday, American Archivist, Journal of the Society of Archivists) says, 'yes' to price! Though it won't always be needed. (actually, I got the idea when looking at reviews in various publications KimTryka?
Ah! sorry--I was being an "articles" bigot. Of course you need price in a review. Apologies for being dense!! JuliaFlanders
They do get included in standard citations of works under review. (A link to a book dealer might do as well however! WendellPiez
related to <div>
I think that <div>s need attributes beyond 'id' -- I'd definitely like at least 'type'.KimTryka?
Okay. (But you're not suggesting any special magic for these types yet are you? WendellPiez
What is <xtext> (under <div>)? I don't see a similar tag in TEI so I can't come up with an analogy.KimTryka?
xtext is like a div only even looser, when you want entire external texts embedded. We don't expect for it to be used much. (Mostly <quote> should do the job.) Mostly it included since it's easy to model and occasionally useful -- and since it's so free form we can constrain div in a TEIish way (which is preferable when we can get it). WendellPiez
I would perhaps gloss this by suggesting that xtext is like div only looser--see the TEI-L strand on floating divs for the background on this. In other words, the idea of xtext is not based on the idea ofsubdivision (<div>), but on the idea of wholeness (<text>). Except that it omits some of the things that make the <text> element a high-level element. JuliaFlanders
I think I'm using in an unexpected way, not to create a list of citations, but within . In this case , as described by Wendell above, serves no purpose because the is not serving as a bibliographic reference that is cited inline within the text. So, no referencing string needed as far as I can tell. KimTryka?
Hm, this is an interesting Ourobouros problem. Should the full bibl listing be there, I wonder? We could probably find a way to give a special rendition to a (and then put the bibl elsewhere) in that location, if you liked, or just have a rule about generating subtitles naming works, so bibls don't have to appear as literals in titles. WendellPiez
Other
Do <abstract> and <teaser> need to be mandatory? I'm just not sure that they are very useful in the context of reviews.KimTryka?
This is an interesting question. Maybe for reviews they are not, and should be made optional. We can do that, and have the Schematron layer check for them perhaps. The requirement is due to the theory that we should get these from authors where possible, not write them ourselves. I'd be interested in others' opinions on this question. WendellPiez
I have now made the changes requested. Testing for abstract and teaser are now in the Schematron, not the schema. WendellPiez
Might anyone be interested in a tag (within <text>?) for "call outs" (quotes that an editor might like to highlight in some manner, maybe in a sidebar?)KimTryka?
I was actually thinking about that -- it's effectively a kind of inline teaser, which can be presented in callouts. The only objection I can see is that such elements cross a line from rhetoric to presentation, and even that's arguable. It is also an interesting boundary question whether an author can and should write these and expect them to be rendered, or whether such callouts don't have to be the job of production staff (wrt which authors should have no particular expectations). I'd be interested in others' thoughts on this one too. WendellPiez
When using a shortened version of a title in the text, should it go inside <title> or in <hi>? Or would someone claim that this might be a place to reference <label>? Though that seems more complex than it needs to be...KimTryka?
I think this is a <title>, which in the main text is little more than renditional. WendellPiez