Digital Humanities Abstracts

“New Technologies, New Strategies for Integrating Information and Knowledge: Forced Migration Online”
Marilyn Deegan University of Oxford marilyn.deegan@qeh.ox.ac.uk Harold Short King's College London harold.short@kcl.ac.uk

The first ten years of the web have largely represented a triumph of interconnectedness over functionality: in the late nineteen eighties and early nineteen nineties information resources and teaching tools were being developed that were highly sophisticated and interactive. The web, for all its benefits of connectivity, actually resulted in a massive downturn in functionality, and we are only now able to recover some of those functions with newer developments. A paradigm example of this loss of functionality is in the Oxford English Dictionary: the first version of this, released in the late 1980s, with a DOS interface, represented a revolution in data access. Version 2, released in 1992 with a Windows interface added little in terms of functionality, but a great deal in terms of access. However, OED Online, released in 1999, gave connectivity and wider access at the cost of a huge loss of the functions that many users had come to rely upon—so much so that many users have never made the transition from CD. This is by no means the fault of the developers, but is a consequence of the platform that we are all now using. New resources are now being developed for data access and retrieval that take full advantage of the benefits of interconnectedness, while giving us enhanced functionality and also allowing us to integrate complex technologies into an apparently seamless whole. This paper will discuss the development of an advanced Internet resource, Forced Migration Online (http://www.forcedmigration.org) that was launched in November 2002.

THE STUDY OF FORCED MIGRATION

Forced migration is defined by the International Association for the Study of Forced Migration as ‘a general term that refers to the movements of refugees and internally displaced people (those displaced by conflicts) as well as people displaced by natural or environmental disasters, chemical or nuclear disasters, famine, or development projects’. Forced migration studies are essentially interdisciplinary, drawing from anthropology, history, politics, international law, sociology, psychology, and many other disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. The documentary base of the subject has grown rapidly over the last twenty years, and scholars and practitioners in the field rely for their information and studies upon a diverse body of work: conventional books and journals, but also largely ‘grey’ (unpublished or semi-published) literature. This grey literature can be difficult to get hold of, as it derives from so many different sources: government agencies, non-governmental organizations, academic sources, etc.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORCED MIGRATION ONLINE

The development of Forced Migration Online (FMO) began in 1997 at the Refugee Studies Centre (RSC) at the University of Oxford. The RSC has the world’s largest collection of grey literature on forced migration (some 15,000 items) and the Andrew W Mellon Foundation granted funding for a portion of this to be digitized. In 2000, the Mellon Foundation and the European Union gave further funding for the development of an integrated portal to be developed on forced migration. The project to develop this portal has been led by the RSC, but with technical and content partners from around the world: the FMO team coordinates participants in some 10 institutions and is working with many more than this to develop content further. FMO now contains 100,000 pages of fully searchable grey literature, 30,000 pages of full-text journal materials, a number of specially-commissioned research guides, a web catalogue with c. 700 entries, an organizations database with c. 800 records, and a prototype image database.

CREATING INFORMATION ARCHITECTURES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FMO

As anyone engaged in the development of digital libraries and portals knows only too well, there is no one obvious tool or technology to implement such complex information resources, though many are currently in development. In FMO, there are a number of different technologies underlying the resource: a complexity which is well hidden from the user, for whom access is relatively simple. The full-text documents are presented using Olive Software’s Active Paper Archive, which was originally developed for presentation of historic newspaper content on the web, and which has proved an excellent choice for the grey literature and journals. FMO is the first project that has used this product in this way, and the development was a joint research project between the FMO technical teams at the RSC and at the Centre for Computing in the Humanities at King’s College London (CCH), and Olive Software. The structured information resources and catalogues are delivered using Esprit Soutron’s xdirectory content management system, and various research guides and other documents are created and presented by means of XML/XSLT. The core challenge is one of integration: integration of a wide variety of information types, drawn from geographically separated repositories capable of providing widely disparate levels of metadata; integration of materials in numerous languages in a variety of scripts; integration of the multiple technologies required to meet the differing information processing and delivery functions; integration of academic analysis and advice for practitioners, and of information and knowledge, to meet widely varying user requirements. Delivering a coherent and integrated resource in a seamless way is a non-trivial technical challenge. It involves visual design, architectural design, development of DTDs and style sheets, and the implementation of leading edge (and therefore constantly evolving) products. Managing the input from so many people and places around the world represents another layer of challenge. This paper assesses the problems of developing and integrating these complex technologies into a hybrid information environment, in particular looking a metadata, cataloguing, preservation, delivery and accessibility issues. It reports on the solutions and partial solutions developed so far, and assesses the extent to which the solutions fall short of the ideal. It also discusses a range of further challenges that the FMO team is now tackling: automatic metadata extraction from journal cross-searching tools for different products using advanced APIs; using focused crawlers as aids to cataloguing; automatic categorization of documents for the creation of regional and topical browse sets. The progress in meeting these challenges will be discussed in the context of the more established work in the project. The paper also places the project in a wider context: of past and current work in the development and delivery of scholarly resources, including a number of projects at IATH in Virginia, in CCH at King's College London, and elsewhere; and of digital library research and development, including projects such as the ‘hybrid library’ projects funded by the UK government (including the Malibu project), the DSpace initiative of MIT and others, and the Mellon-funded FEDORA project based at Virginia and Cornell.